Similarly, I feel the prevalence of anonymous nodes considered because they are probably by the infamous monk is getting pretty high. I understand that the infamously bad advice needs to be dealt with, but knee-jerking a Consideration just because it's anonymous and not overly helpful seems overkill to me. Having the hashed-identifier might make it easier to decide whether to KEEP, REAP, or to abstain (as I usually do in all but the most egregious instances of anonymous bad advice)