in reply to Is there another way to get named captures
> I wonder if there is another way to get named captured groups than %+ or %-.
not without reimplementing it
> and now it looks: my %matches = %+;
sub(\%matches);
why not just
func( { %+ } );
this will pass the hashref of a flat copy, without messing with the globally tied %+
update
demo in debugger
DB<18> use Data::Dumper DB<19> sub func { say Dumper \@_} DB<20> 'ABC' =~ /(?<a>\w)(?<b>\w)(?<c>\w)/; func({%+}) $VAR1 = [ { 'a' => 'A', 'b' => 'B', 'c' => 'C' } ];
NB: if you are only passing the named captures, why not just flattening %+ to a list?
DB<22> sub func { my %matches = @_; say Dumper \%matches} DB<23> 'ABC' =~ /(?<a>\w)(?<b>\w)(?<c>\w)/; func(%+) $VAR1 = { 'a' => 'A', 'b' => 'B', 'c' => 'C' };
Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
Wikisyntax for the Monastery
edit
s/sub/func/ , since sub is a keyword
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re^2: Is there another way to get named captures
by AlexP (Pilgrim) on Jan 09, 2022 at 11:34 UTC |
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom