Re: DON'T USE THIS CODE

http://qs1969.pair.com?node_id=198179

in reply to DON'T USE THIS CODE
in thread File::DumbLock

merlyn sez :

I don't think I should need to add instructions about google-ing to every node I write. {sigh}

Ah, but how would they know they were good examples in your opinion?

Comment on Re: DON'T USE THIS CODE

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: DON'T USE THIS CODE by merlyn (Sage) on Sep 16, 2002 at 08:28 UTC
Ah, but how would they know they were good examples in your opinion? Well, unless I'm schizophrenic, I'd certainly categorize hits to my own columns as "good". -- Randal L. Schwartz, Perl hacker	[reply]
Re: Re: Re: DON'T USE THIS CODE by boo_radley (Parson) on Sep 16, 2002 at 08:50 UTC
So you're saying we need to hear from an objective voice on the subject?	[reply]
Re^4: DON'T USE THIS CODE by particle (Vicar) on Sep 16, 2002 at 15:26 UTC
i don't believe merlyn's objectivity is as important as his expertise on the subject, as evinced by his published work on the subject. ~Particle accelerates	[reply] [d/l]

In Section Code Catacombs