in reply to A more memory efficient storage structure?
Hello again;
I grabbed Devel::Size, and according to it, each of the hashes is 6.1M in size.
'top' shows the memory usage at 18M, and I don't think the interface is using 6M of space... So I'm not entirely convinced thats quite correct. But it stills gives an idea of the inflation - 727k to 6.1M.
I've never been able to make BerkeleyDB install correctly (Out of two tries, I believe), so I'm not terribly interested in it out of previous predjudices, but I could certainly entertain using an ondisk DB... I can't imagine it'd be terribly quick for the lookups, but I'll never know until I try.
(My workstation runs Linux, if that tells anyone anything)
I grabbed Devel::Size, and according to it, each of the hashes is 6.1M in size.
'top' shows the memory usage at 18M, and I don't think the interface is using 6M of space... So I'm not entirely convinced thats quite correct. But it stills gives an idea of the inflation - 727k to 6.1M.
I've never been able to make BerkeleyDB install correctly (Out of two tries, I believe), so I'm not terribly interested in it out of previous predjudices, but I could certainly entertain using an ondisk DB... I can't imagine it'd be terribly quick for the lookups, but I'll never know until I try.
(My workstation runs Linux, if that tells anyone anything)
JP,
-- Alexander Widdlemouse undid his bellybutton and his bum dropped off --
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re: Re: A more memory efficient storage structure?
by Elian (Parson) on Dec 31, 2002 at 19:22 UTC | |
Re: Re: A more memory efficient storage structure?
by shotgunefx (Parson) on Dec 31, 2002 at 19:48 UTC | |
Re: Re: A more memory efficient storage structure?
by perrin (Chancellor) on Dec 31, 2002 at 22:18 UTC |
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom