in reply to Re: A memory efficient hash, trading off speed - does it already exist?
in thread A memory efficient hash, trading off speed - does it already exist?
I tried this earlier on when it became apparent the project would be sucking up great quantities of memory - with very little success. In fact, I think it changed the memory usage by less than a few hundred kilobytes...
This was some time ago, the data set has changed greatly. Perhaps I should try this again and would benefit more from it with a more diverse data set.
This was some time ago, the data set has changed greatly. Perhaps I should try this again and would benefit more from it with a more diverse data set.
I don't even begin to understand that second paragraph. It amazes me how much I can do in perl, and how remarkably little I truly understand about the workings of it all. How embaressing.
My thanks,
JP
-- Alexander Widdlemouse undid his bellybutton and his bum dropped off --
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
An interesting OO representation (was Re3: A memory efficient hash, trading off speed - does it already exist?)
by dragonchild (Archbishop) on Feb 04, 2003 at 15:14 UTC |
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom