http://qs1969.pair.com?node_id=43679


in reply to (jcwren) Re: Casting One's Vote in the Boothe of Voting (twice)
in thread Casting One's Vote in the Boothe of Voting (twice)

Does that mean that since my company works through a proxy, that only one of us can vote? Since I haven't been mysteriously blocked, I guess the other Perl addicts don't vote (or don't vote faster then me). Hmmmm. Gotta tell them to come here again.

=Blue
...you might be eaten by a grue...

  • Comment on Re: (jcwren) Re: Casting One's Vote in the Boothe of Voting (twice)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: (jcwren) Re: Casting One's Vote in the Boothe of Voting (twice)
by merlyn (Sage) on Nov 28, 2000 at 21:14 UTC
    Perhaps we can argue that voting is only for logged-in monks, or maybe AnonMonk gets only one vote. Then we can get one vote per monk, not one vote per IP.

    -- Randal L. Schwartz, Perl hacker

[reply]
      /me agrees this would be preferrable. Or using login name if you're logged in, and IP if you're not. I don't know how many people would actually go through the trouble of voting unlogged in, then revoting.

      But I generally agree that AM should only have one vote. And it goes to whoever gets there first.

      --Chris

      e-mail jcwren
[reply]

In Section Perl Monks Discussion