Re^3: A Level Playing Field

in reply to Re^2: A Level Playing Field
in thread A Level Playing Field

Shortly after you posted this, I read the articles you pointed to, and then I read the two books referred to in the National Review article, by Peters and by Kamen.

My conclusion from reading those books was that you hadn't read them yourself, that you didn't know what you were talking about, and that you were completely full of shit.

--
Mark Dominus
Perl Paraphernalia

Comment on Re^3: A Level Playing Field

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: A Level Playing Field by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Apr 13, 2007 at 21:54 UTC
and that you were completely full of shit. And to think that you were mortally offended, and vigorously defended, for the suggestion that something you said was "just academic hot air". Hmm. Thoughts of geese and ganders. Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error. "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice. "Too many [] have been sedated by an oppressive environment of political correctness and risk aversion."	[reply]
A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.

In Section Perl Monks Discussion