http://qs1969.pair.com?node_id=919179


in reply to Re^16: Feature Request
in thread Feature Request

Your wrong: there is no thumbing down,only thumbing up, Instead of being what 215+ below level 1 novice, and since there are people out there thumbing up comments I make (I see you thanks), I'd be a few levels up. But then I'm not actually a troll, a fact that the stupid legacy software running this site is incapable of determining without the ancient technology of hierarchy maintaining it.

Reread what I actually wrote, my statement was that if the ability to access sections of the site was dependent on the 'respect' (or experience to use the local vernacular), and this (and only this) were implemented, then given your current standing in the Monastery you wouldn't even be able to login.

But then I'm not actually a troll

No, trolls are amusing.

Just who the fuck do you think you are talking about people being held accountable for actions?

Hi Logicus/simonodell I'm The Hindmost, someone talking about the fact that your system makes about as much sense as a submarine made of bread. But honestly, this really does answer quite a number of questions about your inability to deal with other people, and the way you throw your toys out of your cot when someone doesn't automatically declare you 'Lord High Protector of Templating Systems'.

everything else is either just chatter, banter or people being people and arguing with each other and disagreeing over things because no one has all the answers,

Strange how when other people engage in 'chatter, or 'banter' or disagree with you, you're quick to resort to slurs and if I'm perfectly honest the behaviour of a puffed up little popinjay, I refer you to:

Reaped: How I know aXML rocks.
Bad Religion!
Is this the correct address?
Monks && Knights
I will be vindicated
Moores Law, Perl and the future
Pulling Punches

As a list of examples

no matter how much the pyramid behinds the scenes of this site encourages narccistic behaviour and beliefs.

What is this I don't even? Once again, I refer you to:

Reaped: How I know aXML rocks.
Is this the correct address?
I will be vindicated
Moores Law, Perl and the future
Pulling Punches

So you can reflect on some examples of 'narccistic'(sic) behaviour as exemplified by simonodell and Logicus.
In closing:

Your wrong

My wrong what? (couldn't resist).

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^18: Feature Request
by Logicus (Initiate) on Aug 08, 2011 at 14:11 UTC

    On the subject of trolls, I treat them like a game of Lemmings... they come in one at a time and have no idea what's waiting for them when every single member of the community has the ability to flag them as a rule breaker, and every single member of the community has the right to vote on it but they are not told who they are voting about, only the offending comment + the rule it has allegedly broken.

    Having trolls log in and be informed that they have been turned into Arnold Judas Rimmer and are now stuck like that is funny! It probably doesn't mean anything to the american audience because Rimmer was a highly annoying (but still oddly loved) character on a British Sitcom called Red Dwarf. He is a hologram, made up entirely of light and still manages to irritate everyone, oh and he's dead. Brilliant.

    Couple that with the gigantic scrolling banner "Noob Mocker Device", and you got plenty of lulz from the trolls. But then the site I'm building is primarily a comedy house, not a "serious" work place fully of stuffy suited business types and long haired hippy programmers who put way too much personal emphasis and character basis on being an awesome wizard or a goblin or whatever, I can afford to have a more relaxed attitude.

    Oh and btw when I fell out with John from TPUC over shall we say, religious grounds; He want's to turn off the internet, I had a whole bunch of TPUC monkeys doing their best to troll the hell out of ahoynoob, and the defences worked fine (once I'd finished them).

[reply]
      and have no idea what's waiting for them when every single member of the community has the ability to flag them as a rule breaker, and every single member of the community has the right to vote on it but they are not told who they are voting about, only the offending comment + the rule it has allegedly broken.

      Which is effectively down voting, something you previously (and I quote):

      there is no thumbing down,only thumbing up
      - Re^16: Feature Request

      claimed did not occur under your system.

      fully of stuffy suited business types and long haired hippy programmers who put way too much personal emphasis and character basis on being an awesome wizard or a goblin or whatever

      And out come the vague attempts at insults, that didn't take long.

[reply]
        I give up you think whatever suits you.
[reply]
A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.

In Section Perl Monks Discussion