http://qs1969.pair.com?node_id=11144652


in reply to Re^7: RFC: Policy regarding abuses of the voting system
in thread RFC: Policy regarding abuses of the voting system

I agree; and I don't think the language in the OP goes to that level of precision; not even close. But we want to have something written down so that when we do have to take action, we have something we can refer to. And I feel that the three nodes I referenced are in fact far too vague and scattered to be usable.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^9: RFC: Policy regarding abuses of the voting system
by LanX (Saint) on Jun 10, 2022 at 13:05 UTC
    I agree with you, this reply pertained to the whole sub-thread...

    One can't codify everything, it's even impossible to anticipate everything.

    Let's say we had a hypothetical rule saying that more than 5 insults per day are not acceptable, then someone would insist he only insulted 4.5 times per day and that "wanker" is a normal greeting in Greece.

    It's a fine line for admin interventions too.

    Me and several others left another board because a (technical) admin started to delete posts criticizing her random "interventions".

    So starting this public thread is exactly the way to go...

    Cheers Rolf
    (addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
    Wikisyntax for the Monastery