Re: A year at Perl Monks

merlyn for providing countless articles on Stonehenge and in TPJ that helped me along this path

I appreciate the compliment. But there seems to be this persistent bad meme that I've written for TPJ. To set the record straight, I've never written for TPJ in my life. I've written over 150 magazine articles, and continue to write 3 articles every two months, making me the world's most prolific Perl author. But I never wrote for TPJ.

-- Randal L. Schwartz, Perl hacker

Comment on Re: A year at Perl Monks

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: A year at Perl Monks by chromatic (Archbishop) on Sep 05, 2002 at 21:59 UTC
The quantity of articles you have written for TPC was countless in the Western world for centuries...	[reply]
Re: Re: A year at Perl Monks by Marza (Vicar) on Sep 05, 2002 at 21:50 UTC
Just because TPJ failed does not mean you have to deny writting for them. It is ok. It was a good magazine once. :-pppppppp It is funny what people will belive. You can send out a memo stating simply "As to the rumors, insert name is not pregnant" and she will get several people asking her if she is. How I know this? Ahhh just guessing! ;-)	[reply]

In Section Meditations