Re: RFC: On renaming Tracing and Assertions

in reply to RFC: On renaming Tracing and Assertions

Don't use the name Assertions; it will conflict with the new assertions module in perl5.9.x and ponie.

Comment on Re: RFC: On renaming Tracing and Assertions

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: RFC: On renaming Tracing and Assertions by dragonchild (Archbishop) on Oct 28, 2004 at 02:44 UTC
Oooh ... that looks very nice. I wonder if there should be a mod_perl keyword added to support that ... maybe call it PerlAssert foo,bar,baz? Being right, does not endow the right to be rude; politeness costs nothing. Being unknowing, is not the same as being stupid. Expressing a contrary opinion, whether to the individual or the group, is more often a sign of deeper thought than of cantankerous belligerence. Do not mistake your goals as the only goals; your opinion as the only opinion; your confidence as correctness. Saying you know better is not the same as explaining you know better.	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^2: RFC: On renaming Tracing and Assertions
by dragonchild (Archbishop) on Oct 28, 2004 at 02:44 UTC

PerlAssert foo,bar,baz

Being right, does not endow the right to be rude; politeness costs nothing.
Being unknowing, is not the same as being stupid.
Expressing a contrary opinion, whether to the individual or the group, is more often a sign of deeper thought than of cantankerous belligerence.
Do not mistake your goals as the only goals; your opinion as the only opinion; your confidence as correctness. Saying you know better is not the same as explaining you know better.

[reply]

In Section Meditations