Re: Test::Warn, 'use' vs 'require'

in reply to Test::Warn, 'use' vs 'require'

use

eval { 
  require Test::Warn;
  Test::Warn->import(@use_args);
};
[download]

See use

update: in other words, require does NOT import anything. if you want to use "require" as a replacement for "use" you'll have to call import() by hand.

"What should it profit a man, if he should win a flame war, yet lose his cool?"

Comment on Re: Test::Warn, 'use' vs 'require' Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Test::Warn, 'use' vs 'require' by asarih (Hermit) on Sep 27, 2006 at 20:09 UTC
The `eval` block appears to fail even on a system that does have Test::Warn. The content of "$@" is: Undefined subroutine &Test::Warn::import called at t/01-test_errors.t line 13.	[reply]
Re^3: Test::Warn, 'use' vs 'require' by Joost (Canon) on Sep 27, 2006 at 20:17 UTC
The eval block appears to fail even on a system that does have Test::Warn. Erm.. that's wierd. Are you sure you're calling `Test::Warn->import();` instead of `Test::Warn::import()` ? "What should it profit a man, if he should win a flame war, yet lose his cool?"	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^4: Test::Warn, 'use' vs 'require' by asarih (Hermit) on Sep 27, 2006 at 20:27 UTC
Oops. You're right. I did have `Test::Warn::import`. I fixed this typo, but all the same, I get the same error as before and the test script dies. $ perl t/01-test_errors.t 1..43 $@: ARRAY(0x6acb08) is not a hash reference. ok 1 - non-hash reference to cpf2data() Can't call method "warning_like" without a package or object reference at t/01-test_errors.t line 18. # Looks like you planned 43 tests but only ran 1. # Looks like your test died just after 1. Here, `ARRAY...` is the warning that I want to trap.	[reply]
Re^5: Test::Warn, 'use' vs 'require' by Joost (Canon) on Sep 27, 2006 at 20:44 UTC

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom