in reply to Re^21: ref to read-only alias ... why? (notabug)
in thread ref to read-only alias ... why?
Just like him, I agree the inconsistency is a bug.
Gaaah! Why didn't you say that earlier? I was sure you meant that it's not a bug. Good we're coherent at last.
I only have a problem with your fix.
Well I wouldn't insist on it; I posted it because I thought it's better than nothing, than a bug that slept for 8 years. I don't have the competence though to make a more proper patch, but I do hope that at least my incomplete patch stirs attention and something will be made on the issue.
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re^23: ref to read-only alias ... why? (notabug)
by ikegami (Patriarch) on Jan 19, 2012 at 01:33 UTC |
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom