note
jcwren
I generally agree with everything you've mentioned, with the exception of the <strong>/anon</strong> command. I am very opposed to something like that. For all practical purposes, it would be the same as allowing Anonymous Monk to use the chatterbox. I'm all for freedom of speech, but there has to be accountability.
<br><br>
--Chris
<br><br>
<center>e-mail <a href="mailto:jcwren@jcwren.com">jcwren</a></center>
41348
41385