Oh if it were only that easy...

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
(jeffa) RE: Oh if it were only that easy... by jeffa (Bishop) on Aug 15, 2000 at 20:28 UTC
<sarcasm> Ok, this is completely tasteless. I mean, just look at the way you have enclosed your braces. For shame. </sarcasm>	[reply]
RE: Oh if it were only that easy... by johannz (Hermit) on Aug 15, 2000 at 21:44 UTC
I'm voting this '--' not just because it's sexist, since we all occasionally make an accidentally sexist remark. I'm marking it '--' because it is blatently sexist and goes against the inclusive, accepting environment that I believe we have come to expect here at perlmonks. Also, Jaymoo, if you make a mistake on a post, it is better to update it rather then re-enter it.	[reply]
RE: Oh if it were only that easy... by LeGo (Chaplain) on Aug 17, 2000 at 00:59 UTC
The ninth line of code has chick not defined as a scalar. This might cause problems in the Pimp realm. Try: `{Big::Pimp pimpslap($chick);}` [download] instead of `{Big::Pimp pimpslap(chick);}` [download] LeGo	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re: Oh if it were only that easy... by Anonymous Monk on Apr 02, 2001 at 04:53 UTC
Since $chick is a object of class Women, you can just use $chick->issexy instead of Women::issexy($chick). Also, you forgot the :: between Big::Pimp and (kidnap\|pimpslap) `use Big::Pimp; use Women; foreach $chick (@world) { if ($chick->issexy) { Big::Pimp::kidnap($chick); Big::Pimp::pimpslap($chick) until $chick->ismine; } else { next $chick; } }` [download]	[reply] [d/l]
RE: Oh if it were only that easy... by Anonymous Monk on Aug 16, 2000 at 17:35 UTC
i don't know....i bet there are a few out there that might be able to use it... not me of course... :)	[reply]


Perl-Sensitive Sunglasses
	PerlMonks