Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks chromatic writing perl on a camel
Perl Monk, Perl Meditation
 
PerlMonks  

Perl Monks Discussion

( #1040=superdoc: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??

This section is only for discussing issues pertaining to the PerlMonks web site. You can ask about how things work, or offer ideas on how the site could be improved, for example.

Unless the topic pertains to the PerlMonks web site, it does not belong in this section. If you're unsure, check out Where should I post X? and The Perl Monks Guide to the Monastery, or ask in the chatterbox.

PerlMonks Discussions
Maximum down-votes per monk/day
5 direct replies — Read more / Contribute
by LanX
on May 14, 2013 at 10:11
    Hei Monastery!

    How many down-votes can I give to a special fellow monk, w/o them being invalidated at the end of the day?

    His constantly spreading nonsense, never provides code to prove his "theories" and is immune to any open critic.

    I don't care about loosing XP for down-voting, I just want my votes to count.

    So how many per day, or which percentage of my votes can I dedicate to his propaganda?

    Cheers Rolf

    ( addicted to the Perl Programming Language)

    PS: Not interested in discussing his identity, elections are secret.

Thank You Monks!
1 direct reply — Read more / Contribute
by walkingthecow
on May 13, 2013 at 08:59
    I just want to say thank you to everyone here for all your help. I remember 15 years ago when I was doing my first install of Slackware Linux, I'd ask questions in IRC channels and be met with replies like, "Stupid question.", "RTFM", and so on. I guess my early Linux experience has always made me a bit apprehensive about asking questions. However, this community truly makes a person feel like there is no such thing as a stupid question. You've always been willing to help, and I've never been met with any snide or rude replies. This community is the #1 reason I love Perl, honestly. It's the reason I stick with it. I'm still learning, and still making a lot of mistakes, even after all these years; but I know that if I am ever stuck, or having a difficult time figuring something out on my own, someone here will kindly help me understand. For that, I truly appreciate all of you, and all of your help.

    Thank you Monks for making the Perl community so awesome. And thank you all for helping me along my way as I have learned.
Changing PM Link behavior
4 direct replies — Read more / Contribute
by blue_cowdawg
on May 04, 2013 at 06:05

    One of the minor annoyances (very minor, nothing to get worked up over) is the fact when there is a link in either PM chat or in a posting clicking on it has you leave the page you are on and replace that page with the referenced link.

    How much trouble would it be to change the behavior of links inside of square bracket to open a new window using

    <a href=".." target="_blank">
    type of linkages? Is there a downside to that?

    Just a random thought that occurred to me in my sleep deprived state.


    Peter L. Berghold -- Unix Professional
    Peter -at- Berghold -dot- Net; AOL IM redcowdawg Yahoo IM: blue_cowdawg
Preview Page Anomaly
1 direct reply — Read more / Contribute
by kcott
on Apr 30, 2013 at 02:16

    G'day Monks,

    I'm fairly certain that previews of a posting used to start like this:

    preview page

    by vroom

    However, the posting I'm currently previewing starts like this:

    preview page

    by PublicAccess

    Super Search finds no matches for "PublicAccess" (in titles or text) in the last two years.

    Following the links to PublicAccess and then tye&nbsp;, this looks like it may be related to some sort of testing. So, possibly not a problem but, if it is, the issue's been raised. :-)

    -- Ken

Lots of votes with nowhere to go :-)
14 direct replies — Read more / Contribute
by space_monk
on Apr 22, 2013 at 13:29

    As one ascends the lofty heights of Monkdom, one gets more and more votes to use, and there is an incentive in using your votes as it helps to increase your own experience.

    However, one does not necessarily see nodes that are worth using all your votes on, so I ask what do those of you who do have lots of votes use them on? Or do you leave a large amount of them unspent?

    If any of my proposed solutions have minor errors, it's because I don't waste my genius on trivial matters. :-P
Broken link to "Cool Uses For Perl"
4 direct replies — Read more / Contribute
by sg
on Apr 21, 2013 at 23:41
    From the links in the upper right corner, I am able to access "Seekers of Perl Wisdom" -- but the link to "Cool Uses For Perl" is broken.
how to do perldoc links with special characters
2 direct replies — Read more / Contribute
by Lotus1
on Apr 20, 2013 at 12:32
Additions to the FAQ and a Community Statement
3 direct replies — Read more / Contribute
by Co-Rion
on Apr 15, 2013 at 14:49

    After the recent heated discussion below How many man-hours would you estimate you have invested in learning Perl?, some suggestions were made with the aim to improve how people could voice their concerns with postings here. Additionally, there was a request from TPF to clarify the relationship between Perlmonks.org and positions and statements of TPF.

    I see some need to discuss the potential changes, as I do not want the actions of a few vocal voices to negatively impact the majority of the community here.

    Relation to TPF

    The relationship between Perlmonks.org and TPF was so far only displayed on every page as a link, but there was no description of what the relationship actually is. I would like to clarify the relationship with text in the Perlmonks FAQ like the following

    Perlmonks.org is loosely related to TPF. TPF provides the legal entity representing Perlmonks.org in the real world. The postings on Perlmonks.org represent exclusively the positions of their respective authors and not the positions and opinions of TPF (nor of the site administrators, hosting providers, or anyone else).

    This should be fairly obvious to the long-time users of this site, but not everybody is aware of the history of Perlmonks.org and its relationship to TPF.

    The official way to contact the Perlmonks.org administators, /msg'ing gods, will also be linked from that FAQ page. As this feature is also available to Anonymous Monk, this provides a reasonable venue to get in contact should one feel the need to do so.

    Some people have voiced the idea that anonymous contribution here is detrimental to the level of discussion. The recent discussions at 1024035 have not shown a wide desire or support to enforce accounts for contributing.

    Community statement

    This statement should be obvious, but it seems that it bears repeating:

    While the community of this site welcomes people from all walks of life, we do not welcome postings outside the scope of programming in general. The specific focus of this site lies on the Perl programming language.

    We have established methods for determining whether a posting on this site does not belong here, or does belong to a special section. Please review "What is consideration?", "How do I use the power of consideration responsibly?", "Where should I post X?", and "PerlMonks Sections". Please do use the consideration feature if you feel that a posting on this site does not belong here. If you feel in doubt as to whether a posting is within the community guidelines, please contact the administrators before posting.

    We appreciate a civil tone here. The self-regulating mechanisms of this site tend to work very well, but when posting or replying to a post, you should respect the other person. Personal attacks are not welcome here. If you think you need to reply to a personal attack in public, consider sleeping over it or otherwise delaying such a missive. Also consider asking other site members to review a draft of your text as to whether it is appropriate before posting.

    The following should also go into the Site FAQ:

    Advice for long threads

    "A discussion has been going on but somebody replies to me every time. How can I close a thread?"

    If you get into a prolonged discussion with an individual on this site, please consider whether your discussion actually positively contributes to the topic. After ten or more replies, such a thread rarely brings some technical result and likely has devolved into an emotional battle. As it takes at least two participants in such a thread, consider agreeing to disagree and stop posting to that thread, no matter how good you think your cause is, and no matter how wrong you think the other side is.

We Have a New Pope
5 direct replies — Read more / Contribute
by kcott
on Apr 13, 2013 at 19:22
May I please get a box of PerlMonks cookies?
3 direct replies — Read more / Contribute
by Lady_Aleena
on Apr 09, 2013 at 16:26
Not Able to View all the replies on the same page as that off the thread
1 direct reply — Read more / Contribute
by slayedbylucifer
on Mar 29, 2013 at 02:31

    Hello Monks.

    This question is related to the perlmonk website usage.

    The questions I have is when I am viewing any thread, I can see only up to 3 replies on the same as that of the thread. Any other replies beyond 3 replies, I need to open it in new tab/windows to read it. How to display the replies beyond “Re^3” on the page as that off the thread and not opening a new tab/window?

    e.g.:

    Check this thread: Curious find while comparing grep, map, and smart match...

    Scroll down half way through and you will find a lot conversation between users "dbuckhal", "BrowserUk".

    The replies went upto "Re^10".

    However, I can views only up to reply Re^3. And for further replies, I need to open that particular reply in a new tab/window to read the response.

    I have increased the reply depth as well as tried different browsers but it is still the same.

    I can view the detailed reply response only up to "Re^3" for any thread and anything after that, I need to open it in a new tab.

    Thanks.

Spam filter?
1 direct reply — Read more / Contribute
by LanX
on Mar 26, 2013 at 21:57
    Hi

    maybe it's worth considering to auto-reap postings according to certain filter criterias.

    Like 'lou'.'bou'.'tin' in title (intentionally scrambled)

    Supposed it's possible to unreap false positives again...

    Cheers Rolf

    (addicted to the Perl Programming Language)

Progression Malaise
7 direct replies — Read more / Contribute
by space_monk
on Mar 25, 2013 at 18:21
    Dear fellow Monks,

    I joined this site several years ago, but mainly to absorb the wisdom of the monks and I did not contribute or vote much. As a result I remained humbly in the lower orders until about 6 or 7 months ago when I decided to put in some effort to contribute to the Prayers and Offerings, which resulted in my promotion to the exalted rank of Friar.

    However, since then I seem to have lost my fiery desire to race to Sainthood, and therefore whilst I contribute occassionally, my progress to Hermit seems to have slowed.

    Have you experienced the same loss of interest in your progress, and did you necessarily regard it as a bad thing? Should a Monk be competitive about wanting to be promoted?

    I humbly await your thoughts on the issue.....

    A Monk aims to give answers to those who have none, and to learn from those who know more.
Strange message in chatterbox
2 direct replies — Read more / Contribute
by McA
on Mar 25, 2013 at 10:16

    Hi all,

    Currently I have the following message in my chatterbox:

    root says root just sends automated notices, but you tried to reply "" to it.
    Please, what does this mean?

    McA

What do you think about "Thank you"-nodes?
12 direct replies — Read more / Contribute
by McA
on Mar 22, 2013 at 05:44

    Hi Monks,

    I had some questions in the past, which were answered fast and helpfully for me. Really great. That's the reason why I take the time to answer other questions as good as I can. I want to give something back as I don't like to have outstanding dept. (Yes, yes, I'm sure I'll never pay back the whole dept of using the Perl ecosystem ;-) )

    When I answer a question I'm really interested in feedback: Whether it was read or hopefully helped to solve the problem. That's the reason why I regularly write - let's call it - "Thank-you-nodes".

    Now I want to hear your opinion: These nodes don't have any Perl related information. The "only" information they have is valuable to the one who was so kind to take his time helping me.

    Do you feel disturbed by these "Thank-you-nodes"? Do you think pressing ++ commentless is enough?

    McA


Discussion Item
Title:
Give us your input:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post; it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":


  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • Outside of code tags, you may need to use entities for some characters:
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.
  • Log In?
    Username:
    Password:

    What's my password?
    Create A New User
    Chatterbox?
    and the web crawler heard nothing...

    How do I use this? | Other CB clients
    Other Users?
    Others chilling in the Monastery: (21)
    As of 2013-05-22 13:02 GMT
    Sections?
    Information?
    Find Nodes?
    Leftovers?
      Voting Booth?

      The best material for plates (tableware) is:









      Results (461 votes), past polls