Slip, slide, slip, slide. Down the content control slope we go.

As some folks are aware, i am against the editors group in its current incarnation, the current consideration system, and i am against this as well.

• This appears to have the same lack of accountability as the editors group
• Where does humor or satire become abuse? How is it decided? Another committee? Oh joy.
• "select set of users" how are they selected? fiat? open vote?
• I see no evidence that there is even a problem to begin with; what has antivroom done wrong?

I am not prepared to support a system remotely like this; you will be punishing people for having a "position" (if you can call a nick a position) that people simply don't like. That is censorship, and i do not approve.