Re: Time to stop paco?
by blakem (Monsignor) on Aug 07, 2001 at 02:32 UTC
|
I don't have a strong opinion one way or the other. However, your 'vote for paco' crusade did make me think
a bit more about how I cast my votes. After reading the
poor paco post, I decided to actively seek out
good posts from newer members to vote on. I like sending a "welcome to the club, thanks for participating" message.
If it has that effect on others, and make the monestary a
more inviting place perhaps its OK for paco to hit the
best nodes list...
-Blake | [reply] |
Re: Time to stop paco?
by trantor (Chaplain) on Aug 07, 2001 at 16:37 UTC
|
Well, I don't think paco or your signature can do any harm
to us!
Besides, you don't specify what you mean by vote, so
it might by a ++ as well as a -- :-)
Let's face it, paco has a purpose! More than one, actually:
- is paco a he or a she? I'd like to use strict; and be
objective, but I think it's a he
- when you first join PM and paco has more XP than you... well
what else could motivate you better?
- you've never cast a --. You're too humble.
You're too new. You don't know what's going to happen,
maybe the CB will even display you've downvoted. Try on paco!
- you're secretly trying to find paco's password to impersonate
h(im|er) and bring h(is|er) glory back to life.
- one day, I know, paco will seat right next to NodeReaper and watch all of us...
we should treat h(im|er) right while we can
- if someone starts downvoting paco, we can actually start a paco XP prediction
daily contest, prizes are yet undef, but they all \Ovid*. It can be done even if
paco receives ++ votes only but it's a bit more predictive.
- from now on, in my code examples, $paco will deserve just as much attention as $foo and $bar
- one day, paco's XP may be just as informative as $NORM, who knows
-- TMTOWTDI
* That is, they all reference Ovid
| [reply] [d/l] [select] |
|
| [reply] |
Never stop paco ... he's our man!
by dragonchild (Archbishop) on Aug 07, 2001 at 00:42 UTC
|
| [reply] |
New mascot ? (Re: Time to stop paco?)
by arhuman (Vicar) on Aug 07, 2001 at 11:10 UTC
|
I found it funny, too at first, and ++ paco...
However best jokes are the shortest ones.
To my mind you should just let the thing die by removing it from your sig.
But this let an interesting question open :
What/who will be the monastery mascot ?
"Only Bad Coders Code Badly In Perl" (OBC2BIP)
| [reply] |
|
| [reply] |
Re: Time to stop paco?
by mattr (Curate) on Aug 07, 2001 at 17:45 UTC
|
In the Chatterbox recently..
paco thinks being an AM is
not so bad.. well back to the
hot dog stand! ;)
Seriously though, I hope paco hasn't
come back recently thinking to get into
Perl again and horrified at the ton of
posts/++'s has changed his name.. how
could we know, and what if he is here now?
I was going to joke about it (well I did;) but maybe
enough's enough?
p.s. thanks for the minuses guys, just made friar
a few hours ago so I'll
take this node down if it goes much lower. | [reply] |
(MeowChow - now we finish it!) Re: Time to stop paco?
by MeowChow (Vicar) on Aug 07, 2001 at 07:02 UTC
|
| [reply] |
(jeffa) Re: Time to stop paco?
by jeffa (Bishop) on Aug 07, 2001 at 19:55 UTC
|
<hypmotized>
i liked it better than
Cats,
i'll vote for paco again and again . . .
</hypmotized>
jeffa
| [reply] [d/l] [select] |
(tye)Re: Time to stop paco?
by tye (Sage) on Aug 08, 2001 at 20:44 UTC
|
My suggestion would be to drop paco from your sig, not because paco on Best Nodes would be a problem, but because there are plenty of references to the idea now and the best running gags only run so long.
Without your sig, I'm sure we'll still see plenty of paco references popping up from time-to-time and that paco's XP will continue to grow.
-
tye
(but my friends call me "Tye")
| [reply] |
Gimme a P! Gimme an A! Gimme a C! Gimme an O! Whatddayaget?!?
by mischief (Hermit) on Aug 07, 2001 at 15:13 UTC
|
P-A-C-O!
Why not? One vote each isn't going to harm the universe. I found it funny, I think most people would too; I don't see any reason to stop.
| [reply] |
Re: Time to stop paco?
by djw (Vicar) on Aug 07, 2001 at 19:05 UTC
|
Paco? Forget Paco! CowboyNeal (is|should be) the mascot for everything!!
djw | [reply] |
Re: Time to stop paco? (Can anything be off-topic in this thread?)
by boo_radley (Parson) on Aug 07, 2001 at 20:39 UTC
|
I think you need to ask yourself, as I ask myself in troubling times,"WWPD?" | [reply] |
Re: Time to stop paco?
by melguin (Pilgrim) on Aug 07, 2001 at 22:35 UTC
|
Besides being incredibly useful and an overall nice place to hang out, this site is so funny.
I wish I were still taking my anthropology class and had to do a field study--I'd definately do it on PM. We have our own politics (formal), politics (non-official, but often more powerful), social classes, education system, dialects, and weather system (well, maybe not that yet). It just goes to show that any small portion of the "real world" is going to be a reflection of the whole.
Keep paco. | [reply] |
|
Ah, but we do have a weather system; you can just go to jcwren's Monk Map and find the latitude/longitude for a monk, and from that you can find the weather conditions! :)
| [reply] |
Re: Time to stop paco?
by spartan (Pilgrim) on Aug 07, 2001 at 22:41 UTC
|
Well, after reading all the references, and paco's lone post, I still have to say that I don't get it. Was paco's question the very first question to ever be asked on PM's? What does the tongue in cheek reference mean? I know I may be taking my life in my hands here for asking, but I guess I've let my curiousity get the best of me.
Very funny Scotty... Now PLEASE beam down my PANTS! | [reply] |