Re: Suaveant's JAPH with a twist

Without strict, 5.005_03 and 5.6.0 do the same thing. The 'twist' requires 5.6.0 or newer.

It is a nice trick. ++ on this one from me.

Chris

Comment on Re: Suaveant's JAPH with a twist

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Suaveant's JAPH with a twist by suaveant (Parson) on Aug 08, 2001 at 22:29 UTC
Oops... yeah, I used 5.6.1, what does it do in 5.005? Is it sufficiently obfuscated, or is it just messy? :) - Ant - Some of my best work - Fish Dinner	[reply]
I'm not the best judge of obfu by mr_mischief (Monsignor) on Aug 08, 2001 at 22:35 UTC
There are better people to ask about 'sufficiently obfuscated', but I must say, it's pretty good from where I sit. As for behavior under 5.005, it says that @KZB needs to be declared. Chris	[reply]


The stupid question is the question not asked
	PerlMonks