Re: Felling a tree JAPH

This 4x48 snippet prints JAPH on all Perl version I tested it on.

sub'DESTROY{print${sub'_(_){bless\pop}pop}->[0]}
_[J,_[q q q,_[o^O,_[q[,]],_[k,_[r],_[e]],_[h,_[c
],_[a]]],_[P,_[n&_],_[r],_[e],],],_[u,_[a,_[h,_[
r],_[e],],_[n,_[t],_[o],],],_[q[s],_[$"],_[t]]]]
[download]

It still uses the “chopping a tree” concept, but the tree is hard-coded, rather than being built dynamically based on a string.

Here it is with indentation to evidence the tree’s structure:

_[J,
    _[q[ ],
        _[q[ ],
            _[q[,]],
            _[k,
                _[r],
                _[e]
            ],
            _[h,
                _[c],
                _[a]
            ]
        ],
        _[P,
            _[l],
            _[r],
            _[e],
        ],
    ],
    _[u,
        _[a,
            _[h,
                _[r],
                _[e],
            ],
            _[n,
                _[t],
                _[o],
            ],
        ],
        _[q[s],
            _[q[ ]],
            _[t]
        ]
    ]
];
[download]

Comment on Re: Felling a tree JAPH Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Felling a tree JAPH by MidLifeXis (Monsignor) on Sep 04, 2013 at 14:23 UTC
`$ perl -v This is perl, v5.8.8 built for msys $ perl 20130830.1052349.japh.pl Malformed prototype for main::_: _ at 20130830.1052349.japh.pl line 2.` [download] --MidLifeXis	[reply] [d/l]
Re^3: Felling a tree JAPH by Grimy (Pilgrim) on Sep 04, 2013 at 15:01 UTC
Well then, just replace this `_` with a `$`. It should work the same way, I only chose `_` for aesthetic reasons. EDIT: Never mind trying, it won’t work, actually. Here’s a fixed version: `sub'DESTROY{print${sub'_($){bless\pop}pop}->[0]} _[J,_[q q q,_[o^O,_[q[,]],_[k,_[r],_[e]],_[h,_[c ],_[a]]],_[v80,_[l],_[r],_[e],],],_[u,_[a,_[h,_[ r],_[e],],_[n,_[t],_[o],],],_[q[s],_[$"],_[t]]]]` [download] Tested on 5.8, 5.10, 5.14 and 5.16.	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^4: Felling a tree JAPH by MidLifeXis (Monsignor) on Sep 04, 2013 at 15:27 UTC
Cool. It works. I will take a bit of time to look at this later. --MidLifeXis	[reply]


Syntactic Confectionery Delight
	PerlMonks