note
Anonymous Monk
<p><i> ... functionally similar ... </i><P> Its <i>functionally </i> superior but the namespace/syntax changes/inconsistencies/kludges will drive you mad
<p> I've written many hundreds small less than 100 lines Tk programs, and about 10-20 Tkx ones ... Tkx hurts so much its not funny
<p> In theory it sounds great, but whatever edge Tk.pm gives you in terms of perlishness/memorability/quickness Tkx just rips it out with the inconsistency
<p> Tcl::pTk makes it bearable but needs more than [href://http://docs.activestate.com/activeperl/5.16/lib/Tcl/tkkit.html|Tcl::tkkit]
<p> I stick with Tk
<p> If I absolutely must have the new Tcl/Tk widgets (which is never) I'll go for Tcl::pTk, but otherwise stick with Tk.pm
<p> Tkx -- never again voluntarily (only for massive cash)
<p> [id://947720|Re: TclTk interface with Perl code, is it possible?] [id://924745|Re^2: GUI toolkit+designer for the perl newbie]
1061137
1061304
3