No. If people don't like the fact that he's there, well, then they can contribute more answers to FAQ's, tutorials, reviews, CUFP's, and so on.
The Reaper is a warning and a reminder. Post responsibly and help your companions.
Besides, do you wanna be the one to tell he he's not one of our best assets? He's touchy enough about that whole picture thing.
You gonna tell him?
I'm not gonna tell him, you tell him.
I know, let's get tilly; he hates everyone.
He told him. *snicker, snack* Hey, tilly...
Sorry; couldn't resist. I've met tilly and I know he can take a joke. :-)
--f
| [reply] |
I think of him as a good user to have around and
consider him one of the best. Though maybe I'm just trying to
curry favor...
I am curious why # of writeups on Our Best Users doesn't
match up with homenode numbers. Worst skew is with
Nodereaper at -38/279. boo_radley is off by 6,
tilly by 2, etc...
| [reply] |
As long as NodeReaper never makes it onto Saints in our Book, I don't mind. As it is, it's a good indication of just how many nodes have needed removal. I don't even see a link to Best Users in any of the nodelets I have turned on. | [reply] |
If you'll do that, also remove QandAEditors since that's a group or office not a single person.
I agree, if you want him off the list, get 5 other users to pass him up! Come on boo_radley, you're gaining on him!
—John
The Most Prolific PerlMonk | [reply] |