|
|
|
| Do you know where your variables are? | |
| PerlMonks |
Re: Higher resolution $^T?by Anonymous Monk |
| on Jun 22, 2014 at 08:45 UTC ( [id://1090816]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
|
Short question: can I get a more precise $^T, i.e. down to milli- or microsecond? No, not without patching/recompiling perl so that $^T/basetime stops using time_t and switches to something like Time::HiRes uses, timeval ... not worth the effort IMHO
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||