Re^4: My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:

Clearly, but not Actually:

You can make a 1:1 mapping of reals in the range 1..2 to reals in the range 1..3 (using a -1*2+1 pattern)

Thus, contrary to the obvious answer, there are exactly the same number of numbers in both ranges.

Comment on Re^4: My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is: by syphilis (Archbishop) on Jul 17, 2014 at 02:16 UTC
Clearly, but not Actually Yes, but my sophistry would probably convince many - especially those who like to think about "degrees of uniqueness". Cheers, Rob	[reply]


No such thing as a small change
	PerlMonks