choroba will likely come along with some more details for you, but maybe this will suffice for now, given:

$mw->after( 'idle',
    [ configure => $styleref_select_parent, -background => 'cyan' ],
);
[download]

Even though it could be made more clear, we do see in the Internal Details documentation:

$time is the string 'idle', representing an idle queue timer, or a integer millisecond value.

If you never wanted to use that idle string anomaly, there is an ->afterIdle method. The equivalent of the above could be coded:

$mw->afterIdle([ configure => $styleref_select_parent, -background => 
+'cyan' ]);
[download]

The See Also links to Tk::callbacks where it shows the valid ways to specify a callback, one of which is:

[ 'methodname', args... ], ...
[download]

So going back to the sample from Khen1950fx, we see that he passes 'configure', as the method name, and $styleref_select_parent as the object reference that will be passed as the first argument to Tk::ItemStyle::configure, along with the with arguments to change the background color. Incidentally, the fact that after() method is attached to the "$mw" object means that the timer will be cancelled if the MainWindow is destroyed before it fires.

Here's one last example, that shows the square brackets turn out to be optional in this case, as well. After two seconds, set the entire background color:

$mw->after( 2000 => configure => $tree, -background => 'green' );
[download]

    I was waiting and hoping if choroba would also respond. Anyway, this kind of detailed response from you does help for newbie like me. I had to repeatedly read through your response and hence it took me sometime to go through the after call details you specified.


1. Now it appears to me that this afterIdle construct,
   

   $mw->after( 'idle', [configure => $styleref_select_parent, 
                        -background => 'cyan' ],
   );
   [download]

   in this particular scenario can be replaced by:
   
    $styleref_select_parent->configure(-background => 'cyan');
   Is my observation correct ?(after all I got the same output) If not, is there any advantage in going for a Tk::After call?


2. Refering to your last example: As per the docs,
   
   (on Tk::Callbacks) the callback when using methodname has the syntax,
   
        ... => ['methodname', args... ] ...
   
   and the Tk::after method has the syntax
   

            after(*ms*, *callback*?).
   [download]

   So how do these fit in to permit the syntax  2000=> configure => $tree
   in your code:
   $mw->after( 2000 => configure => $tree, -background => 'green' ); ?


3. I'm eagerly trying to get a handle in understanding this afterIdle method. So I chanced to come across the problem Table matrix suspected selected cell discrepancy and the solution to it Tablematrix 'odd' behaviour of mouse and key solved. where the method
   

           sub brscmd {
                my ($previous_index, $actual_index) = @_;
                my ($row, $col) = split ',', $actual_index;
                my ($sel, $js);
   
                $sel =  $t->curselection(); # <-- THE PROBLEM
                print "@$sel\n";
                foreach $js (@$sel) {
                print "\n[brscmd] actual index 
                          <$actual_index>
                          from curselection <$js>\n";
                   }
                }
   [download]

   was replaced by

           sub brscmd {
                my ($previous_index, $actual_index) = @_;
                my ($row, $col) = split ',', $actual_index;
                my ($sel, $js);
   
                $t->after( 'idle',  # <-- THE SOLUTION
                           sub{
                                my $sel = $t->curselection();
                                print "@$sel\n";
                                foreach $js (@$sel) {
                                   print "[brscmd] actual
                                   index <$actual_index> 
                                   from curselection <$js>
                                   last_button_key 
                                   <$last_button_key>\n";
                                }
                }
           );
   }
   [download]

   and things just happen to work fine.
   
   But I'm unable to grasp the idea behind using  afterIdle call here.

I realize that the number of monks responding to questions on Perl/Tk is generally less than what is comes to other areas of Perl. Since last week the count is again down by 1 after very useful zentara bid adieu to PM.

So any information monks provide, I say sincerely, will be useful indeed.
Many Thanks