Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Keep It Simple, Stupid
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: RFC: Better Best Answers Gets Real

by jdporter (Paladin)
on May 17, 2019 at 16:13 UTC ( [id://11100187]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: RFC: Better Best Answers Gets Real
in thread RFC: Better Best Answers Gets Real

Maybe another new group is a cleaner solution

Good point. Editors became Janitors with even less pretext...

QandAEditors had the power to ad/edit/delete content and i do not think this power is related to starred nodes.
Here we have the right to modify a node at any moment, even after years. I think this is a good feature.

It's something to think about. At the very least, we should be able to tell a poster, "Hey, if you fix your writeup like so, we'll give it a gold star."

Maybe starred nodes stay read only until they have a star on it?

I'm concerned about the potential for abuse. QandAEditors have a much freer hand to improve CatQ's and CatA's for the good of the section. (Heck, the original poster doesn't even retain ownership of the post!) I don't think we want to give anyone that kind of license in the SoPW section, regardless of justification.

gods are so rare nowadays: I'd not charge them of other tasks.

Let's not presume we'll have a problem. We can address the problem if/when it arises.

I reckon we are the only monastery ever to have a dungeon stuffed with 16,000 zombies.
  • Comment on Re^2: RFC: Better Best Answers Gets Real

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://11100187]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others meditating upon the Monastery: (6)
As of 2024-04-18 06:25 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found