That's not the Perl architectural design. Perl has a lightweight core and a pluggable module system. It works phenomenally well, has done for more than two decades, and made Perl a viable, commercially useful language that continues to provide professional software developers with high-paying jobs.

Many would say that Rakudo's stubborn insistence on attempting to do All the Things is what condemned it to be not viable, not commercially useful, and the provider of no high-paying jobs for software developers.

Maybe, but irrelevant to Motriz' comparison. And it's not a hypothetical question, there are lighter languages than Perl natively supporting concurrency.

Nice try hijacking a Perl 6 thread nevertheless.

Many would say^{[weasel word]}

"Weasel words help to obscure the meaning of biased expressions and are therefore dishonest." -- https: //simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Avoid_weasel_words

Then there's the old classic "changing the subject when no argument can be found" ...



The way forward always starts with a minimal test.