Re: Uninitialized value and a dot between $schema and $table

This is what you've seen if you had actually used strict instead of just pretending to.

Global symbol "$dsn" requires explicit package name (did you forget to
+ declare "my $dsn"?) at pm13.pl line 9.
Global symbol "$database" requires explicit package name (did you forg
+et to declare "my $database"?) at pm13.pl line 9.
Global symbol "$dbh" requires explicit package name (did you forget to
+ declare "my $dbh"?) at pm13.pl line 10.
Global symbol "$dsn" requires explicit package name (did you forget to
+ declare "my $dsn"?) at pm13.pl line 10.
Global symbol "$dbh" requires explicit package name (did you forget to
+ declare "my $dbh"?) at pm13.pl line 12.
Global symbol "$schema" requires explicit package name (did you forget
+ to declare "my $schema"?) at pm13.pl line 12.
Global symbol "$table" requires explicit package name (did you forget 
+to declare "my $table"?) at pm13.pl line 12.
Execution of pm732.pl aborted due to compilation errors.
[download]

holli

You can lead your users to water, but alas, you cannot drown them.

Comment on Re: Uninitialized value and a dot between $schema and $table Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Uninitialized value and a dot between $schema and $table by tukusejssirs (Beadle) on Aug 08, 2019 at 21:40 UTC
(1) I don’t just pretend, I use `use strict;`. (2) Yeah, I forgot `my` before definition of `$dsn; $dbh`, my mistake. However, I only copy-pasted this code, I have properly defined all variables in the full code. On the other hand, I modified the code so much that I cannot reproduce the error now. Still I have some other errors (like `Global symbol "$cols_type" requires explicit package name at ./test6.pl line 156.`), which are somewhat related to this, however, all my variables are properly declared/defined (I have double-checked it). I’m sorry I opened this poor-quality question. :(	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^3: Uninitialized value and a dot between $schema and $table by shmem (Chancellor) on Aug 08, 2019 at 22:14 UTC
I’m sorry I opened this poor-quality question. :( No harm done. Just keep in mind: the more accurate the question, the better the answers. perl -le'print map{pack c,($-++?1:13)+ord}split//,ESEL'	[reply]


good chemistry is complicated, and a little bit messy -LW
	PerlMonks