Re^4: Section Dividers - What are your thoughts (POD antipattern)

You mean Literate Programming and for clarity POD isn't!

It doesn't allow reordering of doc or code (tangle/weave)

But Perl has the power of sub-modules* and one could "weave" .pod files instead.

Cheers Rolf
_{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)

Wikisyntax for the Monastery}

*) to structure code

Comment on Re^4: Section Dividers - What are your thoughts (POD antipattern)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Section Dividers - What are your thoughts (POD antipattern) by Anonymous Monk on Jun 08, 2020 at 11:16 UTC
You mean Literate Programming and for clarity POD isn't! Sorry, my mistake. Yes, POD is isn't NOWEB. (I think that you would agree that embedding a literate programming system in `/usr/bin/perl` would complicate things too much.)	[reply] [d/l]
Re^6: Section Dividers - What are your thoughts (literate programming) by LanX (Saint) on Jun 08, 2020 at 12:41 UTC
> (I think that you would agree that embedding a literate programming system in /usr/bin/perl would complicate things too much. No, I disagree in this generality. But it depends what the goal is. I'm not sure if Knuth had the possibilities to use modules as alternatives back then. And he didn't know the necessities of CPAN (though CTAN was the source) Personally I like having some docs* close to code. That's why I once realized a solution to parse docs from sub modules to generate a .pod file. Not sure what LP can offer more here or if this even helps realizing it's main goal. Cheers Rolf _{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :) Wikisyntax for the Monastery} *) there are many different types of documenation, which need to be separated in this discussion here.	[reply]


Do you know where your variables are?
	PerlMonks