Re^9: Shouldn't references be readonly? (updated)


Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister
	PerlMonks

by chromatic (Archbishop)

on Aug 06, 2020 at 00:41 UTC ( [id://11120384]=note: print w/replies, xml )

Need Help??

That... is actually a pretty good example.

Run it through Deparse though, and:

use strict;
use warnings;
use Data::Dump ('pp', 'dd');
use constant ('a', 1);
$\ = "\n";
print \1;
print \1;
print \1;
print \1;
[download]

Comment on Re^9: Shouldn't references be readonly? (updated) Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^10: Shouldn't references be readonly? (updated) by LanX (Saint) on Aug 06, 2020 at 01:35 UTC
> Run it through Deparse though, And what do you think that proves? Cheers Rolf _{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :) Wikisyntax for the Monastery}	[reply]
Re^11: Shouldn't references be readonly? (updated) by chromatic (Archbishop) on Aug 06, 2020 at 05:26 UTC
The same thing that you do: there's a subtlety of implementation that Deparse doesn't catch.	[reply]
Re^12: Shouldn't references be readonly? (updated) by LanX (Saint) on Aug 06, 2020 at 11:57 UTC
Oh well, I see ... you caught the subtleties ... Cheers Rolf _{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :) Wikisyntax for the Monastery}	[reply]

Domain Nodelet^?

Node Status^?

node history
Node Type: note [id://11120384]
help

Chatterbox^?

How do I use this? • Last hour • Other CB clients

Other Users^?

Others romping around the Monastery: (7)

As of 2024-04-16 12:07 GMT

Sections^?

Information^?

Find Nodes^?

Leftovers^?

Voting Booth^?

No recent polls found