Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Problems? Is your data what you think it is?
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: [OT] gay marriage controversy (How the heck did we get here?)

by LanX (Saint)
on Oct 16, 2020 at 07:36 UTC ( [id://11122894]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: [OT] gay marriage controversy (How the heck did we get here?)
in thread When is it time to stop posting to CPAN?

Marriage is a contract changing your legal status.

I don't want a pizzeria to decide who is raising my kids, has the right to switch off my respirator and inherits my Perl books ...

Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
Wikisyntax for the Monastery

  • Comment on Re^2: [OT] gay marriage controversy (How the heck did we get here?)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: [OT] gay marriage controversy (How the heck did we get here?)
by tobyink (Canon) on Oct 16, 2020 at 22:36 UTC

    Yet contract law in general requires very little government oversight.

    When I sign a contract with a business, there's no government registrar required to witness it, or keep an official record of it. Unless one of us breaks the contract and it needs to go to court, why is government oversight of contracts useful?

      > why is government oversight of contracts useful?

      Far reaching legal implications like tax laws, immigration laws, ... etc

      > there's no government registrar required to witness it,

      Who else should do the registration? Facebook?

      Cheers Rolf
      (addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
      Wikisyntax for the Monastery

        So scrap any tax benefits of marriage. Why on Earth should the tax man care about whether a couple who live together are married or not? That's just weird and ought to be totally irrelevant to calculating how much money you should be contributing towards the running of the state — it doesn't affect how many state resources you use, nor does it affect your earning capability. If couples living together use fewer state resources (like only needing one box of recycling collecting rather than two separate ones) and it's a big enough saving that they deserve a tax cut, then they should get one regardless of whether they're married, and regardless of whether they're romantically or sexually involved with each other because none of that ought to be relevant.

        Scrap any immigration laws surrounding marriage. There's not really any good reason for them to exist, and immigration authorities don't trust marriage contracts anyway. When someone wants to move their foreign spouse into a country, you often hear about them quizzing the couple on "which side of the bed does she sleep on?" and "how does he take his coffee?" (orally, of course!) so it's already the relationship between the people that matters, and not whether they have the right paperwork. So drop the pretence.

        Why must anybody do the registration?

      ... why is government oversight of contracts useful?

      Why is government useful? 😫💥⌨️🤯🤦😊🃏😊

      A throwaway analogy is the best way learn about the history and politics of our oldest institutions :) not sarcasm at all 👊🥊

Re^3: [OT] gay marriage controversy (How the heck did we get here?)
by Anonymous Monk on Oct 16, 2020 at 08:14 UTC
    Then you should have won the pizza wars 😌🐐

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://11122894]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others imbibing at the Monastery: (6)
As of 2024-04-23 08:29 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found