Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister
 
PerlMonks  

Re^4: Bidirectional lookup algorithm? (sundialsvc4 spam)

by marto (Cardinal)
on Jan 07, 2015 at 14:57 UTC ( #1112491=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^3: Bidirectional lookup algorithm? (sundialsvc4 spam)
in thread Bidirectional lookup algorithm? (Updated: further info.)

"Yes, that is my name. But, pardon me, you don’t seem to be using yours. Wonder why."

It has finally happened, you don't even know your own name any more! This explains the quality of your posts. You don't even read what people post, then reply anyway.

Update: I do not for one moment believe that you have actually forgotten your own name. A more constructive way to have approached this would have been to point out brown M&M story. In the past I've engaged you on responding to things people didn't say, and in some cases quoting things that nobody has said, to no avail.

  • Comment on Re^4: Bidirectional lookup algorithm? (sundialsvc4 spam)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Bidirectional lookup algorithm? (sundialsvc4 spam)
by karlgoethebier (Abbot) on Jan 07, 2015 at 20:03 UTC
    ... This explains the quality of your posts...

    There is no post by this certified asshole that has something like quality (the non-inferiority or superiority of something).

    I'm really disconsolate that i got no more votes tonight. Tomorrow i'll up vote your reply ASAP.

    And i will continue to recommend down voting anything posted by this monk without distinction as a good default policy.

    Update: See also Assholes: A Theory.

    Best regards, Karl

    «The Crux of the Biscuit is the Apostrophe»

      Yesterday shortly after posting I made an update, not removing what I said, rather adding to it, explaining my position as I'd clearly become exasperated and should not have responded in this manner. In future I'll stick to the factual rather than farcical, and (FWIW) urge others to consider doing the same.

      Update: fixed typo.

        Thank you marto for clarifying. Sure, it is true that i lost countenance a bit.

        And i'm d'accord with you that concentrating on the basic theme ;-) of PM is a good thing.

        But i don't regret anything i wrote.

        Best regards, Karl

        «The Crux of the Biscuit is the Apostrophe»

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1112491]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others chanting in the Monastery: (4)
As of 2022-05-27 19:49 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    Do you prefer to work remotely?



    Results (97 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?