Re^6: Bidirectional lookup algorithm? (sundialsvc4 spam)

Yesterday shortly after posting I made an update, not removing what I said, rather adding to it, explaining my position as I'd clearly become exasperated and should not have responded in this manner. In future I'll stick to the factual rather than farcical, and (FWIW) urge others to consider doing the same.

Update: fixed typo.

Comment on Re^6: Bidirectional lookup algorithm? (sundialsvc4 spam)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^7: Bidirectional lookup algorithm? (sundialsvc4 spam) by karlgoethebier (Abbot) on Jan 08, 2015 at 20:01 UTC
Thank you marto for clarifying. Sure, it is true that i lost countenance a bit. And i'm d'accord with you that concentrating on the basic theme ;-) of PM is a good thing. But i don't regret anything i wrote. Best regards, Karl ŤThe Crux of the Biscuit is the Apostropheť	[reply]


P is for Practical
	PerlMonks