I am OT here but there is a site for watching scientific publications being retracted (most because of false data): https://www.reactionwatch.com and here you can see one of these falsifications https://pubpeer.com/storage/image-1517672284260.png but there are others more "advanced" using ... photoshop's mirror-image. Basically they get past data="western blots" (it is used to "measure" protein expression by means of visual examination!) and claim is for a new study as long as it shows what they want. For a long time, I used to believe that contradictory biological findings were due to the complexities of living organisms but the other factor of course is falsification of experimental results. And then the pandemic hit...

Procrustes? Surely a Biologist.

Disclaimer: not all biologists are like that: https://forbetterscience.com, just a ~ 5-10%. No affiliation with any websites.

bw, bliako

FWIW: I just read an article doubting the numbers in preprint attesting 90% efficacy to the Sputnik V corona jab

Sputking-V typoed numbers and missing data (Sorry only German version)

Scientists keep asking for clarification without getting answers.... :/

Cheers Rolf
_{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
Wikisyntax for the Monastery}

The huge money involved distorts everything. All vaccines have now been given to lots of people. Time will tell. But with all the mutations any victory can be pyrrhic.