Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Problems? Is your data what you think it is?

Re: Anonymous Identifier

by pryrt (Monsignor)
on Feb 23, 2021 at 19:47 UTC ( #11128710=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Anonymous Identifier

Similarly, I feel the prevalence of anonymous nodes considered because they are probably by the infamous monk is getting pretty high. I understand that the infamously bad advice needs to be dealt with, but knee-jerking a Consideration just because it's anonymous and not overly helpful seems overkill to me. Having the hashed-identifier might make it easier to decide whether to KEEP, REAP, or to abstain (as I usually do in all but the most egregious instances of anonymous bad advice)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Anonymous Identifier
by stevieb (Canon) on Feb 23, 2021 at 19:55 UTC

    Note that Janitors can unconsider a node... I do feel your pain though, but I'm not at the point where I feel we should eliminate Anonymonk account... yet.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://11128710]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others drinking their drinks and smoking their pipes about the Monastery: (2)
As of 2022-06-28 03:24 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    My most frequent journeys are powered by:

    Results (89 votes). Check out past polls.