Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Perl Monk, Perl Meditation
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Anonymous Identifier

by LanX (Sage)
on Feb 23, 2021 at 19:49 UTC ( #11128711=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Anonymous Identifier

I think we have enough measures to handle this.

I can only plead to fellow monks to judge posts by quality no by (presumed) author.

Otherwise iff really a technical solution was needed in the future I'd rather suggest lowering the number of downvotes needed to hide a post from the public.

See also RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors

Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
Wikisyntax for the Monastery

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Anonymous Identifier
by pryrt (Abbot) on Feb 23, 2021 at 20:03 UTC
    ++ to judge posts by quality no by (presumed) author -- I definitely agree with that sentiment.

    To me, RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors doesn't seem to have been as effective as it was intended... or monks are considering posts for reaping without allowing the hide-very-bad-answers to take effect.

    I think we have enough measures to handle this.

    The need for your plea in the first case, and the number of considerations of bad anonymous posts rather than letting them get de-emphasized properly, leads me to believe that the measures aren't sufficient, or aren't being used properly. Hence the impetus for my PMD.

    Further, that doesn't address the other aspect: the "no, I'm the other anonymous monk" issue for following discussions. And a non-reversible, non-personal, but somewhat-uniquely-identifying hash seems a good way to solve that problem.

    The latter problem has actually bothered me almost since I first arrived here, but it was never strong enough to be worth suggesting. But now that I've realized that the same solution will also help with the other issues I brought up, I thought it was worth discussing.

      Techies tend to look for technological solutions for problems, but IMHO this is rather a social one.

      Though discussing an identifier per IP may be worth it in general, I'm sceptique here.

      IMHO evolutionary pressure will only push abuse into other patterns, like VPN tunnels or throw away accounts.

      So please forgive me if I'm not deepening this discussion any further.

      For me it's just another variant of feeding in this asymmetric war. :)

      Cheers Rolf
      (addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
      Wikisyntax for the Monastery

Re^2: Anonymous Identifier
by Anonymous Monk on Feb 23, 2021 at 21:26 UTC
      HINT: You needed to log in and vote to collect those votes. The gods can identify you now ...

      Good night! :)

      Cheers Rolf
      (addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
      Wikisyntax for the Monastery

        pure facts don't need to be tied to a username to be true.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://11128711]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others having an uproarious good time at the Monastery: (4)
As of 2022-08-10 07:18 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found

    Notices?