The question is only some hours old, and some monks are very much into Raku.
So better don't call it off yet. ... :)
> this is not the best place for these questions.
I know you meant it in a helpful way. But
saying something like this might set a tone. :)
Raku questions are very much on topic and welcome here.
| [reply] |
yes, trying to be helpful and minimize wasted time; it'd actually be nice if there was some Raku section, yanno, for good will; for most it just looks like a crusty old perl 5 help site :) - I should note OP's use of [Raku] was nice and shows awareness. Can't count on most to be so courteous I'd think.
| [reply]
[d/l] |
Well since 2 days have now gone by without an authority stepping in, I think you might be right! Actually I didn't interpret your suggestion to try elsewhere in a negative way - I appreciate you pointing it out.
I arrived at the decision to post on perlmonks purely from habit - I've been asking the odd question here since 2005. Also I assumed plenty of other perl-mongers would be playing about with raku - and I did perform a site search for raku before I went ahead. It seemed like there were a substantial number of threads that had [Raku] in the title (which I figured was a convention, and so I copied it). However, I admit I didn't explore too deeply.
I thought I'd give it a couple of days before trying elsewhere, to avoid cross posting. However, now I will officially try the raku mailing list, as suggested. If/when I do get the solution, I will post it back here in the event it helps someone else out.
| [reply]
[d/l]
[select] |
| [reply] |
