Re^4: How to syntax-check Catalyst code which throws 'Invalid CODE attributes' errors?

I posted the above method as a *generic* means of nuking or mocking packages (thanks choroba) and, now it seems, pragmata. It's open to criticism with respect to its usage to this particular scenario, and Catalyst, of which I have no experience.

Comment on Re^4: How to syntax-check Catalyst code which throws 'Invalid CODE attributes' errors?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: How to syntax-check Catalyst code which throws 'Invalid CODE attributes' errors? by Your Mother (Archbishop) on Jun 10, 2021 at 07:15 UTC
Oh, I wasn’t trying to imply anything else. It was a great solution to do what the OP wants. I just don’t think what the OP wants is the best course for this case. And he asked about possible testing approaches in reply to my other node. Update, speling.	[reply]
Re^6: How to syntax-check Catalyst code which throws 'Invalid CODE attributes' errors? by bliako (Monsignor) on Jun 10, 2021 at 07:35 UTC
sure, I am trying to make you criticise it more ! thanks	[reply]


We don't bite newbies here... much
	PerlMonks