Re^4: Adding WIN32API::MIDI Package to Strawberry

http://qs1969.pair.com?node_id=11134947

in reply to Re^3: Adding WIN32API::MIDI Package to Strawberry
in thread Adding WIN32API::MIDI Package to Strawberry

Sure -- by "their protocol" I was referring to MIDI 1.0, which is what the currently available API package that's been collecting dust since 2003 exists for. Are you aware of a MIDI 2.0 package for SP?

Comment on Re^4: Adding WIN32API::MIDI Package to Strawberry

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Adding WIN32API::MIDI Package to Strawberry by marto (Cardinal) on Jul 13, 2021 at 07:38 UTC
No, but then I haven't looked and don't know what you're trying to achieve. Even if there were it would more likely be a perl package rather than anything Strawberry Perl specific.	[reply]
Re^6: Adding WIN32API::MIDI Package to Strawberry by strawberryperls4ever (Novice) on Jul 13, 2021 at 20:50 UTC
I'm developing a MIDI controller; all the scripts were written in Perl of course. If you have any leads, using MIDI 2.0's features would make it waaay cooler. If you're interested, pls take a look at my OP for more of a background on my situation -- the only reason I'm using SP is because it's backwards compatible with the abandonware that I'm using to run Win32API::MIDI.	[reply]
Re^7: Adding WIN32API::MIDI Package to Strawberry by marto (Cardinal) on Jul 13, 2021 at 21:29 UTC
ActiveState, once you've setup the environment properly shouldn't be a problem in terms of compatibility. If you consider the module upon which you depend to be abandonware perhaps adopting it and adding the support or features (MIDI 2.0) you need would be a good idea. My audio workflow is pretty much analog with few exceptions. In terms of controllers, my monome supports Open_Sound_Control.	[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom