Re: canonical doc explaing need for "eval { ... } or do {...}" construct

Hello LanX,

it is already linked, but for me this by them is canonical enough for me :)

Lamentably our docs are at least suboptimal: why dont you fork perldoc and add a paragraph in eval ? I'm sure you can phrase it correctly.

After the PR you can point your collegues to standard documentation.

There are no rules, there are no thumbs..
Reinvent the wheel, then learn The Wheel; may be one day you reinvent one of THE WHEELS.

Comment on Re: canonical doc explaing need for "eval { ... } or do {...}" construct Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: canonical doc explaing need for "eval { ... } or do {...}" construct by LanX (Saint) on May 12, 2022 at 13:29 UTC
Thank you all! :) I think the overall best solution is to mention Try::Tiny in the perldocs. `eval { ...; 1 } or do {...}` might be a good solution if you hate dependencies and want backwards compatibility. But it's just too much boilerplate to keep in mind. Me too, I forgot about the `;1` part when starting this thread. But I'm worried about compatibility issues with Try::Tiny and the new try feature in 5.36. Cheers Rolf _{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :) Wikisyntax for the Monastery}	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^3: canonical doc explaing need for "eval { ... } or do {...}" construct by hippo (Bishop) on May 13, 2022 at 09:02 UTC
But I'm worried about compatibility issues with Try::Tiny and the new try feature in 5.36. According to MetaCPAN there are 15,409 dists depending ultimately on Try::Tiny. I credit those steering the good ship Perl with enough nous to realise that breaking this would be an absolute no-go. 🦛	[reply]
Re^3: canonical doc explaing need for "eval { ... } or do {...}" construct by ikegami (Patriarch) on May 12, 2022 at 14:40 UTC
I think the overall best solution is to mention Try::Tiny in the perldocs. hmmm, the Perl docs probably should be in the business of recommending specific non-core modules. Especially since Perl is getting a `try` keyword...	[reply] [d/l]
Re^4: canonical doc explaing need for "eval { ... } or do {...}" construct by LanX (Saint) on May 12, 2022 at 15:03 UTC
> Especially since Perl is getting a try keyword... which is naturally not backwards compatible Cheers Rolf _{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :) Wikisyntax for the Monastery}	[reply]
Re^5: canonical doc explaing need for "eval { ... } or do {...}" construct by ikegami (Patriarch) on May 13, 2022 at 05:19 UTC
Re^6: canonical doc explaing need for "eval { ... } or do {...}" construct by LanX (Saint) on May 13, 2022 at 06:20 UTC
Some notes below your chosen depth have not been shown here


Welcome to the Monastery
	PerlMonks