Re^5: RFC: Policy regarding abuses of the voting system

OK, that's what I was trying to discern; "downvoting for days on end" is a reasonable qualifier for abusive. With that as an explicit qualifier (descript(ion|or)? explanation?) for what's "massive downvoting" then I'd be much more comfortable with point one.

The cake is a lie.
The cake is a lie.
The cake is a lie.

Comment on Re^5: RFC: Policy regarding abuses of the voting system

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: RFC: Policy regarding abuses of the voting system by jdporter (Chancellor) on Jun 09, 2022 at 14:40 UTC
Thank you. Also, people should be aware that we can see the exact time that each vote is cast. We can tell when a user spent mere seconds, or even less, between votes. :-)	[reply]
Re^7: RFC: Policy regarding abuses of the voting system by Your Mother (Archbishop) on Jun 09, 2022 at 15:52 UTC
Side note: I am, and have been, running ajax voting code in my browser so I can vote as fast as I can click the icons I use for thumbs up and thumbs down without pressing “Stubmit” and waiting for the page to reload. :P	[reply]
Re^8: RFC: Policy regarding abuses of the voting system by jdporter (Chancellor) on Jun 09, 2022 at 16:48 UTC
I've got my eye on you. ;-)	[reply]
Re^8: RFC: Policy regarding abuses of the voting system (how fast do you read? by Anonymous Monk on Jun 09, 2022 at 18:42 UTC
how fast do you read?	[reply]
Re^9: RFC: Policy regarding abuses of the voting system (how fast do you read? by Your Mother (Archbishop) on Jun 10, 2022 at 02:38 UTC
Re^6: RFC: Policy regarding abuses of the voting system (1 day 2 days ... ) by Anonymous Monk on Jun 09, 2022 at 18:41 UTC
downvoting for days on end" is a reasonable qualifier for abusive no, all that means is you like reading poor quality nodes - whats next you're gonna ban reading bad books?	[reply]


XP is just a number
	PerlMonks