Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Perl Monk, Perl Meditation
 
PerlMonks  

Re: RFC: Policy regarding abuses of the voting system

by haj (Priest)
on Jun 09, 2022 at 16:18 UTC ( #11144593=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to RFC: Policy regarding abuses of the voting system

I agree that every vote against a node which isn't based on that node's content is an abuse of the voting system. But does this really need a policy? In my opinion our simple voting system seems to be quite robust against abuse. Every monk can vote on every node just once, so there's an upper limit of "massive" downvoting, whereas nodes worth reading usually accumulate dozens of upvotes quite fast, even with the small community we have as of 2022. I wonder if I'd even notice if someone downvotes every node I ever wrote.

So I'd rather not grant the gods the permanent power to decide on users' XP. This will bring eventually up the question of Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? which I find problematic for a culture run entirely by volunteers.

I do appreciate the availability of the gods to receive complaints about a suspected malicious downvoting campaign, and whenever they find an abuse (any type of abuse) I'm ready to support their decisions to stop it. But trying to enumerate all possible ways of abuse in advance seems to be a waste of effort.

  • Comment on Re: RFC: Policy regarding abuses of the voting system

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: RFC: Policy regarding abuses of the voting system
by Anonymous Monk on Jun 09, 2022 at 16:43 UTC
    I wonder if I'd even notice if someone downvotes every node I ever wrote.
    we do have lists sorted by reps, not only best nodes but also the order of replies are effected.

    and authors will start to question their motivation to participate if they repeatedly experience immediate downvotes as first reaction.

      and authors will start to question their motivation to participate if they repeatedly experience immediate downvotes as first reaction.

      what authors? New seekers don't see negative voting. Older seekers value replies more than side nodelet noise

        New seekers don't see negative voting

        History is full of examples to the contrary.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://11144593]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others avoiding work at the Monastery: (4)
As of 2022-11-29 20:53 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    Notices?