Re^8: RFC: Policy regarding abuses of the voting system


The stupid question is the question not asked
	PerlMonks

Re^8: RFC: Policy regarding abuses of the voting system

by jdporter (Paladin)

on Jun 10, 2022 at 12:48 UTC ( [id://11144652]=note: print w/replies, xml )

Need Help??

in reply to Re^7: RFC: Policy regarding abuses of the voting system
in thread RFC: Policy regarding abuses of the voting system

I agree; and I don't think the language in the OP goes to that level of precision; not even close. But we want to have something written down so that when we do have to take action, we have something we can refer to. And I feel that the three nodes I referenced are in fact far too vague and scattered to be usable.

Comment on Re^8: RFC: Policy regarding abuses of the voting system

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^9: RFC: Policy regarding abuses of the voting system
by LanX (Saint) on Jun 10, 2022 at 13:05 UTC

One can't codify everything, it's even impossible to anticipate everything.

Let's say we had a hypothetical rule saying that more than 5 insults per day are not acceptable, then someone would insist he only insulted 4.5 times per day and that "wanker" is a normal greeting in Greece.

It's a fine line for admin interventions too.

Me and several others left another board because a (technical) admin started to delete posts criticizing her random "interventions".

So starting this public thread is exactly the way to go...

Cheers Rolf
_{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)

Wikisyntax for the Monastery}

[reply]

In Section Perl Monks Discussion