note
Discipulus
Hello again [pryrt],<P>
I forgot to mention my opinion about <C>cpanm</C> already presented in [id://1216016]: something is changed and now is able to test succesfully <C>Text::Xslate</C> but other issue are still there and so I do not suggest it for win32 users. Mainly do not handling path correctly in 2022 is... strange :)
<c>
----------------------------------------------
Welcome to Strawberry Perl Portable Edition!
Perl version : 5.32.0 / MSWin32-x64-multi-thread
C:> cpanm --version
cpanm (App::cpanminus) version 1.7044 (C:\EX_D\ulisseDUE\perl5.32.64bit\perl\bin/cpanm) <--------- O_O \ \ \ /?
C:> cpanm --self-upgrade
Can't find Unicode property definition "e" in regex; marked by <-- HERE in m/^C:\EX_D\ulisseDUE\pe <-- HERE rl5.32.64bit\perl\site\bin/ at C:\EX_D\ulisseDUE\perl5.32.64bit\perl\bin/cpanm line 32.
^---- O_O ?!?!
C:> cpanm --test-only Text::Xslate
...
Successfully tested Text-Xslate-v3.5.9
</c><P>
Unfortunately the will to ignore win32 as a big market share seems to persist in the habits of some, even genial, dev which anyway deserve my deep respect.<P>
If in you I'd remove completely any mention to <C>cpanm</C> for win32 users<P>
L*<P>
<div class="pmsig"><div class="pmsig-174111">
There are no rules, there are no thumbs..<BR>
Reinvent the wheel, then learn The Wheel; may be one day you reinvent one of THE WHEELS.
</div></div><!-- Wiki2Monks {"version":1.161} -->
11145723
11145723