Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Think about Loose Coupling
 
PerlMonks  

Re: The SSSCA, Microsoft's answer to anti-trust?

by lemming (Priest)
on Sep 11, 2001 at 06:19 UTC ( [id://111650]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to The SSSCA, Microsoft's answer to anti-trust?

(4) This Nation faces a shortage of trained, qualified information technology workers, including computer security professionals. As the demand for information technology workers grows, the Federal government will have an increasingly difficult time attracting such workers into the Federal workforce.

Shortage of workers who want to work for minimum wage perhaps?

(6) The Nation's information infrastructures are owned, for the most part, by the private sector, and partnerships and cooperation will be needed for the security of these infrastructures.

I found that interesting since it was once owned by the public sector. And what comes with partnership & cooperation?

"(f) DEVELOPMENT OF INTERNET PRIVACY PROGRAM. -- The Institute shall encourage and support the development of one or more computer programs, protocols, or other software, such as the World Wide Web Consortium's P3P program, capable of being installed on computers, or computer networks, with Internet access that would reflect the user's preferences for protecting personally-identifiable or other sensitive, privacy-related information, and automatically executes the program, once activated, without requiring user intervention.".

Gee, kind of like passport?

Written by tilly
I believe that if this bill passes, I will never again work in IT. My having written this letter will by itself be sufficient to guarantee that. You see, I remember Ed Curry, and see no reason to believe that my case would be any different...

Along with all the Sun, Oracle, IBM, etc... employees. If MS is the only game in town, the demand for engineers will probably go down. The demand for support specialists on the other hand...

Some other thoughts:

  • Though I read that the rat was a supporter of this bill.
  • Looks like current CD players would be illegal. However all your analog media would be fine. Hmmm, is the possiblity of non-digital media a way around this silly act?
  • Can't seem to find the /. article that pointed to the nanotech bits. Instead of 0 or 1, there would be multistate switches. Would that still be digital?
  • Anyway, I'm afraid I'd have to move to another country or find work in another field if the thing passes. I can't see it passing in the form it is now. That's not to say that a scary version still won't get through.

    Replies are listed 'Best First'.
    Re: Re: The SSSCA, Microsoft's answer to anti-trust?
    by John M. Dlugosz (Monsignor) on Sep 12, 2001 at 00:36 UTC
      Yes, multistate switches are still digital. Digital means having discrete well-defined states, as opposed to a fuzzy continuum of states. A multi-POSITION switch is digital. A variable resistor knob is analog.

      DNA is digital. The ribosomes read it as a set of instructions. Does this law outlaw life itself?

      —John

    Log In?
    Username:
    Password:

    What's my password?
    Create A New User
    Domain Nodelet?
    Node Status?
    node history
    Node Type: note [id://111650]
    help
    Chatterbox?
    and the web crawler heard nothing...

    How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
    Other Users?
    Others lurking in the Monastery: (4)
    As of 2024-03-28 20:46 GMT
    Sections?
    Information?
    Find Nodes?
    Leftovers?
      Voting Booth?

      No recent polls found