Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
We don't bite newbies here... much

Re^2: Porting (old) code to something else

by moritz (Cardinal)
on Feb 18, 2015 at 12:04 UTC ( #1117089=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re: Porting (old) code to something else
in thread Porting (old) code to something else

Luckily, not everybody thinks as you do. If everybody waited for new technogies to be proven by market, no new technologies would ever be proven by market. There have to be early adopters to bootstrap any technology. Please don't discurage them, just because you aren't one them.

  • Comment on Re^2: Porting (old) code to something else

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Porting (old) code to something else
by eyepopslikeamosquito (Bishop) on Feb 19, 2015 at 10:31 UTC

    Please don't discourage them, just because you aren't one them
    I don't think he will discourage them. Quite the opposite. You see, sundialsvc4 is the opposite of a key influencer.

    I'm struggling to come up with a term for that, perhaps “cheesy inhibitor”full of ‘cheap’ stylisticdevices, flow–ery →analogies© and “´old bull-shitter´® ‘logic’”¡¿?!  … yet ultimately superficial and unconvincing.

    Update: Instead of "cheesy", perhaps a word starting with i sounds better, for example: "insignificant, ignominious, inept, irrelevant inhibitor". Other alternative adjectives: gormless, fatuous, puerile, pointless, puny, pathetic, pitiful.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1117089]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others musing on the Monastery: (3)
As of 2022-12-03 09:30 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found