Re^2: True or False? A Quick Reference Guide

> I regret that I can only upvote this once.

Actually your reply already pushed it up to 216! :)

> 7 downvotes? Who could downvote this?

False and untrue people? ;-D

Well honestly a 0.3 percent error shouldn't worry you and the html-formatting has some issues...

Cheers Rolf
_{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :)}

Comment on Re^2: True or False? A Quick Reference Guide

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: True or False? A Quick Reference Guide by bobf (Monsignor) on Dec 03, 2015 at 02:51 UTC
I stopped by the Monastery while on a sabbatical and, thanks to your post, found that my once well-formed HTML had degraded into legacy syntax. As I am not familiar with current HTML/CSS conventions, I removed the offending tags to get rid of the errors. (I'd welcome formatting suggestions from anyone that can offer them...) Thanks for alerting me to the issue. Problem fixed (for now).	[reply]
Re^4: True or False? A Quick Reference Guide by Anonymous Monk on Dec 03, 2015 at 03:01 UTC
what does that mean? There is a feature/user setting to enforce proper nesting of html as implemented by tye :)	[reply]
Re^5: True or False? A Quick Reference Guide by bobf (Monsignor) on Dec 03, 2015 at 03:09 UTC
Yup. I've had that feature turned on ever since I learned about it. :-) It looked like my anchors and column settings were no longer valid. Not being an expert (or even a novice) in such things, I assumed it was an issue with HTML5. I'll take formatting suggestions if you've got any...	[reply]
Re^6: True or False? A Quick Reference Guide by Anonymous Monk on Dec 03, 2015 at 03:43 UTC


Clear questions and runnable code get the best and fastest answer
	PerlMonks