Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister

Re: Another 64-bit Perl bug. Is it fixed post 5.18?

by karlgoethebier (Abbot)
on May 24, 2015 at 12:25 UTC ( #1127580=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Another 64-bit Perl bug. Is it fixed post 5.18?

I get this:

v5.20.0 darwin 2147483640 107374182 2147483678 107374183 v5.18.2 darwin 2147483640 107374182 2147483678 0

Regards, Karl

«The Crux of the Biscuit is the Apostrophe»

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Another 64-bit Perl bug. Is it fixed post 5.18?
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on May 24, 2015 at 14:28 UTC

    Thanks Karl. Look's like I'll be upgrading to 5.20.

    With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
    Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
    "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". I'm with torvalds on this
    In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice. Agile (and TDD) debunked

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1127580]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others drinking their drinks and smoking their pipes about the Monastery: (4)
As of 2022-05-23 21:41 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    Do you prefer to work remotely?

    Results (82 votes). Check out past polls.