Hello LanX,

why is this branch called "inner scriptorium" but publicly readable?

From Inner Scriptorium:

Cabal only may post root nodes to this section. But fresh thought often spawns progress, so any Perl Monk may add comments to existing discussion threads within this section.

Cheers,

Silly me ... I thought monkdiscuss aka PMD was meant for open discussions. ..

Cheers Rolf
_{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :)
Je suis Charlie!}

At the time of its creation, Inner Scriptorium was more geared toward progress in the Monastery's code base, where PMD was more geared toward policy, wishlist suggestions, and such. So one was more technical in nature, and the other more social.




Dave

I think LanX's question raises a valid point. Should the Inner Scriptorium be publicly readable or only by logged in monks?

Logged in wasn't exactly my point. :)

Those not belonging to cabal can't easily follow discussions if restricted links are posted (wiki , special nodes and so on)

How should I discuss content which is considered disclosed?

Besides the pmdev wiki explicitly says that discussions should be done on the inner scriptorium.

I haven't seen much discussion here, and I think that's because others have the same problem.

Cheers Rolf
_{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :)
Je suis Charlie!}