Re: XML::Simple needs to go!

by Anonymous Monk

on Dec 21, 2015 at 21:51 UTC ( [id://1150896]=note: print w/replies, xml )

Need Help??

XML::Rules obsoletes XML::Simple

Comment on Re: XML::Simple needs to go!

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: XML::Simple needs to go! by Preceptor (Deacon) on Dec 22, 2015 at 10:48 UTC
So does XML::Twig - it even maintains backwards compatibility thanks to `simplify`	[reply] [d/l]
Re^3: XML::Simple needs to go! by Jenda (Abbot) on Jan 05, 2016 at 23:37 UTC
You could say the same about XML::Rules and inferRulesFromExample/inferRulesFromDTD. One of those will give you a bunch of rules that'll instruct XML::Rules to produce a datastructure equivalent to a well set XML::Simple. Jenda Enoch was right! Enjoy the last years of Rome.	[reply]

In Section Meditations

Domain Nodelet^?

Node Status^?

node history
Node Type: note [id://1150896]
help

Chatterbox^?

How do I use this? • Last hour • Other CB clients

Other Users^?

Others meditating upon the Monastery: (6)

As of 2024-04-23 20:36 GMT

Sections^?

Information^?

Find Nodes^?

Leftovers^?

Voting Booth^?

No recent polls found